Identification of market allocation activities: in addition to price fixing and supply manipulation, contracting agreements between competitors can be discovered. These are horizontal agreements for the allocation of clients and territorial allocation. Pricing is not only about prices, but also about other conditions that affect consumers, such as shipping costs, guarantees, rebate programs or financing rates. Control over cartels and abuse of dominance can occur when competitors discuss the following issues: Liberals believe that stable prices are voluntary and consensual activity between the parties, which should be free from state and state interference. Sometimes pricing ensures a stable market for both consumers and producers. Any short-term benefit of increased price competition will help to drives some producers out of the market and increase bottlenecks and prices for consumers. At the end of the day, pricing legislation forces producers in a market because they cannot compete with the biggest discount and the market dissolves a monopoly anyway.  U.S. consumers have the right to expect the benefits of free and open competition – the best goods and services at the lowest prices. Public and private bodies often use a tendering process to achieve this goal. However, the competition process only works if competitors set prices honestly and independently. When competitors collide, prices are excessive and the customer is deceived.
Price agreements, bid manipulation and other forms of collusion are illegal and are subject to criminal prosecution by the U.S. Department of Justice`s antitrust department. Market allocation or allocation regimes are agreements by which competitors share markets. In these systems, competing companies assign customers or types of customers, products or territories to each other. For example, a competitor may sell certain customers or certain types of customers or offer them on contracts they lease. In return, he or she will not sell or offer to customers assigned by customers assigned to other competitors. In other systems, competitors agree to sell only to customers in certain geographic areas and refuse to sell customers in geographical areas assigned to conspiracy companies or to deliberately sell high prices. However, price-fixing remains legal in the magazine and newspaper distribution sector and sometimes in the film industry.  Retailers that sell under the price are subject to reimbursement of delivery. The Fair Trade Office approved the status quo.
[Citation required] If the price control agreement is sanctioned by a multilateral treaty or is concluded by sovereign nations as opposed to individual companies, the agreement can be protected from legal action and criminal prosecution. That is why OPEC, the global oil cartel, has not been successfully prosecuted or prosecuted under U.S. cartel law and abuse of dominance. An agreement to limit production, sale or production is just as illegal as direct pricing, as reducing the supply of a product or service drives up its price. For example, the FTC challenged an agreement between competing oil importers to limit the supply of lubricants by refusing to import or sell these products to Puerto Rico. Competitors tried to urge lawmakers to remove an environmental tax on lubricants and warned of lubricant shortages and rising prices. The FTC argued that the conspiracy was an illegal horizontal agreement to limit production, which was inherently likely to harm competition and had no competing efficiency gains that would benefit consumers. In late 2005/early 2006, Lufthansa and Virgin Atlantic reported major agreements on freight and passenger overflight prices, which have involved 21 airlines since 200